RTPWiki

/ RTP_COMPARISON · SLOT · PRAGMATIC_PLAY

Gates of Olympus vs Sweet Bonanza

Sweet Bonanza wins on certified RTP with 96.51% vs 96.50% on Gates of Olympus — a 0.01 percentage-point edge. Both titles are from Pragmatic Play, so the certified-variant ladder rules are the same — only the operator deployment differs.

Last verified: 28 May 2026

Verdict

Sweet Bonanza wins on certified RTP with 96.51% vs 96.50% on Gates of Olympus — a 0.01 percentage-point edge. Over the long run that means Sweet Bonanza retains 0.01% more of every wager for the player versus Gates of Olympus, when both are running their certified ceiling variants. On a $100 stake repeated 1,000 times, that's an extra $0.10 returned statistically.

Important: the certified ceiling is only what you'll see at operators that deploy the highest variant. Gates of Olympus ships in 3 variants, Sweet Bonanza in 3. Operator choice can wipe out an RTP advantage on the headline figure — always check the in-game info panel.

Where the certified version actually lives

Gates of Olympus vs Sweet Bonanza — FAQ

Which has the better RTP: Gates of Olympus or Sweet Bonanza?

Sweet Bonanza wins on certified RTP with 96.51% vs 96.50% on Gates of Olympus — a 0.01 percentage-point edge.

What are the main differences between Gates of Olympus and Sweet Bonanza?

Gates of Olympus (Pragmatic Play, 2021) is a high volatility slot, certified at 96.50% RTP. Sweet Bonanza (Pragmatic Play, 2019) is a high volatility slot, certified at 96.51% RTP. Both come from Pragmatic Play, so the certified-variant policies are similar.

Should I play Gates of Olympus or Sweet Bonanza?

If pure return-to-player is your only criterion, pick the higher certified RTP and find a casino that deploys it at the ceiling. If volatility and max-win cap matter, compare the volatility and max-win values in the table below — those drive bankroll behaviour far more than the RTP differential.